GoAccess vs Grafana k6

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGoAccessGrafana k6
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 20,762★ 31,211
First released20102017
ReplacesGoogle AnalyticsLoadRunner, BlazeMeter

Why pick each one

Choose GoAccess if…

  • Extremely fast and lightweight
  • Works fully offline
GoAccess details

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Frequently asked questions

Is GoAccess or Grafana k6 better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana k6 has the larger community, while GoAccess is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are GoAccess and Grafana k6 free and open-source?

Yes. GoAccess is licensed under MIT and Grafana k6 under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run GoAccess and Grafana k6 with Docker?

GoAccess: yes. Grafana k6: yes.

Related comparisons