Sourcegraph vs Windows

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSourcegraphWindows
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0free
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 10,299★ 52,787
First released20142023
ReplacesGitHub code search

Why pick each one

Choose Sourcegraph if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.3k GitHub stars
Sourcegraph details

Choose Windows if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Mature project with 52.8k GitHub stars
Windows details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sourcegraph or Windows better?

Windows is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sourcegraph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Sourcegraph and Windows free and open-source?

Yes. Sourcegraph is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Windows under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sourcegraph and Windows with Docker?

Sourcegraph: yes. Windows: yes.

Related comparisons