Sourcegraph vs json-server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSourcegraphjson-server
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetessource, docker
GitHub stars★ 10,299★ 75,695
First released20142014
ReplacesGitHub code searchMockoon, Postman Mock

Why pick each one

Choose Sourcegraph if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.3k GitHub stars
Sourcegraph details

Choose json-server if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 75.7k GitHub stars
json-server details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sourcegraph or json-server better?

json-server is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sourcegraph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Sourcegraph and json-server free and open-source?

Yes. Sourcegraph is licensed under Apache-2.0 and json-server under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sourcegraph and json-server with Docker?

Sourcegraph: yes. json-server: yes.

Related comparisons