dive vs Sourcegraph

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturediveSourcegraph
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 54,426★ 10,299
First released20182014
ReplacesDocker DesktopGitHub code search

Why pick each one

Choose dive if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 54.4k GitHub stars
dive details

Choose Sourcegraph if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 10.3k GitHub stars
Sourcegraph details

Frequently asked questions

Is dive or Sourcegraph better?

dive is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sourcegraph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are dive and Sourcegraph free and open-source?

Yes. dive is licensed under MIT and Sourcegraph under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run dive and Sourcegraph with Docker?

dive: yes. Sourcegraph: yes.

Related comparisons