Gitea Act Runner vs Forgejo Runner
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Gitea Act Runner | Forgejo Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | GitHub Actions | GitHub Actions |
Why pick each one
Choose Gitea Act Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Forgejo Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea Act Runner or Forgejo Runner better?
Neither is universally better. Gitea Act Runner has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Gitea Act Runner and Forgejo Runner free and open-source?
Yes. Gitea Act Runner is licensed under MIT and Forgejo Runner under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gitea Act Runner and Forgejo Runner with Docker?
Gitea Act Runner: yes. Forgejo Runner: yes.