Argo Workflows vs Gitea Act Runner

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureArgo WorkflowsGitea Act Runner
CategoryCI/CD & BuildCI/CD & Build
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentkubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,885★ 800
First released20172023
ReplacesAirflowGitHub Actions

Why pick each one

Choose Argo Workflows if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Argo Workflows details

Choose Gitea Act Runner if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Gitea Act Runner details

Frequently asked questions

Is Argo Workflows or Gitea Act Runner better?

Neither is universally better. Argo Workflows has the larger community, while Gitea Act Runner is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Argo Workflows and Gitea Act Runner free and open-source?

Yes. Argo Workflows is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gitea Act Runner under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Argo Workflows and Gitea Act Runner with Docker?

Argo Workflows: check the project docs for container support. Gitea Act Runner: yes.

Related comparisons