Agola vs Forgejo Runner
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Agola | Forgejo Runner |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,622 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2019 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Drone, GitHub Actions | GitHub Actions |
Why pick each one
Choose Agola if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose Forgejo Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Agola or Forgejo Runner better?
Neither is universally better. Agola has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Agola and Forgejo Runner free and open-source?
Yes. Agola is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Forgejo Runner under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Agola and Forgejo Runner with Docker?
Agola: yes. Forgejo Runner: yes.