GeyserMC vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGeyserMCNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 5,734★ 13,121
First released20192017
ReplacesMinecraft cross-play workaroundsPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose GeyserMC if…

  • Enables cross-play
  • Works as plugin or proxy
GeyserMC details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is GeyserMC or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are GeyserMC and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. GeyserMC is licensed under MIT and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run GeyserMC and Nakama with Docker?

GeyserMC: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons