GetSimple CMS vs Keystone
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GetSimple CMS
XML-based flat-file CMS for small websites
VS
Keystone
Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API
| Feature | GetSimple CMS | Keystone |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 418 | ★ 9,938 |
| First released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Contentful, Strapi |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GetSimple CMS or Keystone better?
Neither is universally better. Keystone has the larger community, while GetSimple CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GetSimple CMS and Keystone free and open-source?
Yes. GetSimple CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Keystone under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GetSimple CMS and Keystone with Docker?
GetSimple CMS: check the project docs for container support. Keystone: yes.