gallery-dl vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlSpacedrive
CategoryPhoto ManagementFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcebinary
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 38,732
First released20152022
ReplacesManual downloadsGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while gallery-dl is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are gallery-dl and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and Spacedrive with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons