gallery-dl vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlPeerTube
CategoryPhoto ManagementMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM128 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 15,236
First released20152018
ReplacesManual downloadsYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or PeerTube better?

gallery-dl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider PeerTube if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are gallery-dl and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and PeerTube with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons