gallery-dl vs Images.weserv.nl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
VS
Images.weserv.nl
Self-hostable image proxy and on-the-fly resizing service
| Feature | gallery-dl | Images.weserv.nl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Python | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,143 | ★ 2,742 |
| First released | 2015 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Manual downloads | Cloudinary, imgix |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is gallery-dl or Images.weserv.nl better?
gallery-dl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Images.weserv.nl if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are gallery-dl and Images.weserv.nl free and open-source?
Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Images.weserv.nl under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gallery-dl and Images.weserv.nl with Docker?
gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. Images.weserv.nl: yes.