gallery-dl vs Hydrus Network
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gallery-dl
Command-line tool to download image galleries from websites
VS
Hydrus Network
Self-hosted tag-based media organizer and image database
| Feature | gallery-dl | Hydrus Network |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-2.0 | WTFPL |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,143 | ★ 3,148 |
| First released | 2015 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Manual downloads | Google Photos, Eagle |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is gallery-dl or Hydrus Network better?
gallery-dl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Hydrus Network if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are gallery-dl and Hydrus Network free and open-source?
Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Hydrus Network under WTFPL. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gallery-dl and Hydrus Network with Docker?
gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. Hydrus Network: check the project docs for container support.