Fusion vs RSS-proxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Fusion | RSS-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 86 · Excellent | 20 · At risk |
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,184 | ★ 1,923 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader | Feedly |
What are Fusion and RSS-proxy?
Fusion
Fusion is a lightweight, self-hosting-friendly RSS reader with a fast reading workflow, unread tracking, bookmarks, and full-text search. It can extract full article content and deploys as a single binary or Docker container.
- Full-text article extraction
- Unread tracking and bookmarks
- Built-in search
- Single-binary or Docker
RSS-proxy
RSS-proxy is an open-source tool that generates RSS, Atom, or JSON feeds from websites that do not offer them, by analyzing page markup to detect article lists. It runs as a self-hosted service via Docker; its successor project is feedless.
- Creates feeds from any page
- JSON and Atom output
- Self-hosted aggregation
Fusion vs RSS-proxy: key differences
Both projects are written in TypeScript. Fusion is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for RSS-proxy. RSS-proxy is the more established project (first released 2019), while Fusion arrived in 2024.
Why pick each one
Choose Fusion if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
Choose RSS-proxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Fusion or RSS-proxy better?
Fusion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider RSS-proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fusion and RSS-proxy free and open-source?
Yes. Fusion is licensed under MIT and RSS-proxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fusion and RSS-proxy with Docker?
Fusion: yes. RSS-proxy: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Fusion or RSS-proxy?
Fusion has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for RSS-proxy. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.