FreshRSS vs Shaarli
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreshRSS
Free, self-hostable RSS feed aggregator
VS
Shaarli
Personal, minimalist link-sharing bookmark app
| Feature | FreshRSS | Shaarli |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,716 | ★ 3,888 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader, Google Reader | Pocket, Delicious |
Why pick each one
Choose FreshRSS if…
- Lightweight and fast
- Works with many mobile apps
- Actively maintained
Frequently asked questions
Is FreshRSS or Shaarli better?
Neither is universally better. FreshRSS has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FreshRSS and Shaarli free and open-source?
Yes. FreshRSS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreshRSS and Shaarli with Docker?
FreshRSS: yes. Shaarli: yes.