CommaFeed vs Shaarli
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
CommaFeed
Google Reader-inspired self-hosted RSS reader
VS
Shaarli
Personal, minimalist link-sharing bookmark app
| Feature | CommaFeed | Shaarli |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,579 | ★ 3,888 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Pocket, Delicious |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is CommaFeed or Shaarli better?
Neither is universally better. Shaarli has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are CommaFeed and Shaarli free and open-source?
Yes. CommaFeed is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Shaarli under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run CommaFeed and Shaarli with Docker?
CommaFeed: yes. Shaarli: yes.