FreeSWITCH vs Soketi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreeSWITCH
Scalable software telephony platform
VS
Soketi
Self-hostable WebSocket server compatible with Pusher
| Feature | FreeSWITCH | Soketi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,069 | ★ 5,631 |
| First released | 2006 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Twilio, Asterisk | Pusher |
Why pick each one
Choose FreeSWITCH if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is FreeSWITCH or Soketi better?
Soketi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider FreeSWITCH if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FreeSWITCH and Soketi free and open-source?
Yes. FreeSWITCH is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreeSWITCH and Soketi with Docker?
FreeSWITCH: yes. Soketi: yes.