Berty vs FreeSWITCH
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Berty
Peer-to-peer messaging app that works offline
VS
FreeSWITCH
Scalable software telephony platform
| Feature | Berty | FreeSWITCH |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,268 | ★ 5,069 |
| First released | 2018 | 2006 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Signal | Twilio, Asterisk |
Why pick each one
Choose Berty if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose FreeSWITCH if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is Berty or FreeSWITCH better?
Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Berty and FreeSWITCH free and open-source?
Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FreeSWITCH under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Berty and FreeSWITCH with Docker?
Berty: check the project docs for container support. FreeSWITCH: yes.