Asterisk vs Soketi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Asterisk
Open-source framework for building telephony systems
VS
Soketi
Self-hostable WebSocket server compatible with Pusher
| Feature | Asterisk | Soketi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,431 | ★ 5,631 |
| First released | 1999 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Avaya, Cisco Unified Communications | Pusher |
Why pick each one
Choose Asterisk if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
Frequently asked questions
Is Asterisk or Soketi better?
Soketi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Asterisk if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Asterisk and Soketi free and open-source?
Yes. Asterisk is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Asterisk and Soketi with Docker?
Asterisk: yes. Soketi: yes.