Fractal vs Tinode

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFractalTinode
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 900★ 13,452
First released20172016
ReplacesSlack, DiscordWhatsApp, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose Fractal if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Fractal details

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fractal or Tinode better?

Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while Fractal is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Fractal and Tinode free and open-source?

Yes. Fractal is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fractal and Tinode with Docker?

Fractal: check the project docs for container support. Tinode: yes.

Related comparisons