Forte vs Osada
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Forte
open source ActivityPub/fediverse server
VS
Osada
ActivityPub social server with nomadic features
| Feature | Forte | Osada |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | Unlicense | MIT |
| Language | PHP | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 20 |
| First released | 2025 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Facebook, Threads, Tumblr | Facebook, Twitter |
Why pick each one
Choose Forte if…
- Released under the Unlicense license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose Osada if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Forte or Osada better?
Neither is universally better. Osada has the larger community, while Forte is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Forte and Osada free and open-source?
Yes. Forte is licensed under Unlicense and Osada under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Forte and Osada with Docker?
Forte: check the project docs for container support. Osada: check the project docs for container support.