diaspora* vs Osada

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurediaspora*Osada
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageRubyPHP
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,649★ 20
First released20102018
ReplacesFacebook, TwitterFacebook, Twitter

What are diaspora* and Osada?

diaspora*

diaspora* is a free, open-source, privacy-aware decentralized social network. It is organized into independently operated pods that federate, giving users ownership of their data.

  • Federated pod network
  • Aspects for sharing control
  • Hashtag-based discovery
  • Data ownership focus

Read the full diaspora* guide →

Osada

Osada is a decentralized social networking server that speaks the ActivityPub protocol while incorporating nomadic identity concepts from the Zot ecosystem. It federates with Mastodon and other fediverse software.

  • ActivityPub social server
  • Nomadic identity features
  • Federates with the fediverse

diaspora* vs Osada: key differences

Diaspora* is written in Ruby, while Osada is built with PHP. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for diaspora* versus MIT for Osada. Osada is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for diaspora*. Diaspora* is the more established project (first released 2010), while Osada arrived in 2018. Diaspora* has the considerably larger community, at 13,649 GitHub stars versus 20. Diaspora* lists first-class Docker deployment; Osada does not.

Why pick each one

Choose diaspora* if…

  • Strong privacy ethos
  • Established network

Watch out for

  • Limited fediverse interoperability
  • Slower development
diaspora* details

Choose Osada if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Osada details

Frequently asked questions

Is diaspora* or Osada better?

Neither is universally better. diaspora* has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are diaspora* and Osada free and open-source?

Yes. diaspora* is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Osada under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run diaspora* and Osada with Docker?

diaspora*: yes. Osada: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, diaspora* or Osada?

Osada has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for diaspora*. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons