Flying Carpet vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFlying CarpetSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,266★ 87,439
First released20172014
ReplacesAirDrop, SnapdropDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Flying Carpet if…

  • Works fully offline
  • Cross-platform including mobile
Flying Carpet details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Flying Carpet or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Flying Carpet and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Flying Carpet is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Flying Carpet and Syncthing with Docker?

Flying Carpet: check the project docs for container support. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons