FluffyChat vs Snikket
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | FluffyChat | Snikket |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Dart | Lua |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,039 | ★ 437 |
| First released | 2019 | 2020 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Telegram | WhatsApp, Signal |
Why pick each one
Choose FluffyChat if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Dart
Frequently asked questions
Is FluffyChat or Snikket better?
Neither is universally better. FluffyChat has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are FluffyChat and Snikket free and open-source?
Yes. FluffyChat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Snikket under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FluffyChat and Snikket with Docker?
FluffyChat: check the project docs for container support. Snikket: yes.