Berty vs FluffyChat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBertyFluffyChat
CategoryChat & CommunicationMatrix & XMPP
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptDart
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 9,268★ 3,039
First released20182019
ReplacesWhatsApp, SignalWhatsApp, Telegram

Why pick each one

Choose Berty if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 9.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Berty details

Choose FluffyChat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Dart
FluffyChat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Berty or FluffyChat better?

Neither is universally better. Berty has the larger community, while FluffyChat is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Berty and FluffyChat free and open-source?

Yes. Berty is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FluffyChat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Berty and FluffyChat with Docker?

Berty: check the project docs for container support. FluffyChat: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons