SHSelfHostIndex

Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS vs FluffyChat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS OAuth2 and OIDC authentication service for Matrix VS FL FluffyChat Cute, cross-platform Matrix messenger
FeatureCoqui Chat Synapse-MASFluffyChat
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustDart
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 277★ 3,039
First released20222019
Replaces—WhatsApp, Telegram

Why pick each one

Choose Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS details

Choose FluffyChat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Dart
FluffyChat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS or FluffyChat better?

FluffyChat is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS and FluffyChat free and open-source?

Yes. Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FluffyChat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS and FluffyChat with Docker?

Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS: yes. FluffyChat: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons