Converse.js vs FluffyChat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConverse.jsFluffyChat
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseMPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptDart
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,285★ 3,039
First released20132019
ReplacesSlackWhatsApp, Telegram

Why pick each one

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Choose FluffyChat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Dart
FluffyChat details

Frequently asked questions

Is Converse.js or FluffyChat better?

Neither is universally better. Converse.js has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Converse.js and FluffyChat free and open-source?

Yes. Converse.js is licensed under MPL-2.0 and FluffyChat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Converse.js and FluffyChat with Docker?

Converse.js: yes. FluffyChat: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons