Cinny vs Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cinny
Simple, elegant and secure Matrix client
VS
Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS
OAuth2 and OIDC authentication service for Matrix
| Feature | Cinny | Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,826 | ★ 277 |
| First released | 2021 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Cinny or Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS better?
Cinny is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cinny and Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS free and open-source?
Yes. Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cinny and Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS with Docker?
Cinny: yes. Coqui Chat Synapse-MAS: yes.