Cinny vs Bonfire
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cinny
Simple, elegant and secure Matrix client
VS
Bonfire
Federated social networking toolkit for communities
| Feature | Cinny | Bonfire |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Elixir |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,826 | ★ 930 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Facebook Groups, Discord |
Why pick each one
Choose Bonfire if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Elixir
Frequently asked questions
Is Cinny or Bonfire better?
Cinny is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Bonfire if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Cinny and Bonfire free and open-source?
Yes. Cinny is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Bonfire under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cinny and Bonfire with Docker?
Cinny: yes. Bonfire: yes.