FluffyChat vs Tinode

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFluffyChatTinode
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageDartGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,039★ 13,452
First released20192016
ReplacesWhatsApp, TelegramWhatsApp, Slack

Why pick each one

Choose FluffyChat if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Dart
FluffyChat details

Choose Tinode if…

  • Good developer foundation
  • Multiple clients
  • Lightweight
Tinode details

Frequently asked questions

Is FluffyChat or Tinode better?

Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community, while FluffyChat is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FluffyChat and Tinode free and open-source?

Yes. FluffyChat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Tinode under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FluffyChat and Tinode with Docker?

FluffyChat: check the project docs for container support. Tinode: yes.

Related comparisons