Firezone vs Headscale
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Firezone
Open-source secure remote access platform
VS
Headscale
Open-source self-hosted Tailscale control server
| Feature | Firezone | Headscale |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Elixir | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,993 | ★ 42,612 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Cisco AnyConnect, Tailscale | Tailscale |
Why pick each one
Choose Firezone if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9k GitHub stars
- Written in Elixir
Frequently asked questions
Is Firezone or Headscale better?
Neither is universally better. Headscale has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Firezone and Headscale free and open-source?
Yes. Firezone is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Headscale under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Firezone and Headscale with Docker?
Firezone: yes. Headscale: yes.