Firefish vs Iceshrimp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFirefishIceshrimp
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,300★ 300
First released20222023
ReplacesTwitter, MastodonTwitter, Mastodon

Why pick each one

Choose Firefish if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Firefish details

Choose Iceshrimp if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Iceshrimp details

Frequently asked questions

Is Firefish or Iceshrimp better?

Neither is universally better. Firefish has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Firefish and Iceshrimp free and open-source?

Yes. Firefish is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Iceshrimp under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Firefish and Iceshrimp with Docker?

Firefish: yes. Iceshrimp: yes.

Related comparisons