Bridgy Fed vs Firefish
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bridgy Fed
Bridge connecting IndieWeb sites to the fediverse
VS
Firefish
Customizable fediverse microblogging platform
| Feature | Bridgy Fed | Firefish |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | Unlicense | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,229 | ★ 1,300 |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Twitter, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose Bridgy Fed if…
- Released under the Unlicense license
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Firefish if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Bridgy Fed or Firefish better?
Firefish is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Bridgy Fed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Bridgy Fed and Firefish free and open-source?
Yes. Bridgy Fed is licensed under Unlicense and Firefish under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bridgy Fed and Firefish with Docker?
Bridgy Fed: check the project docs for container support. Firefish: yes.