Finamp vs LMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Finamp
Jellyfin music player with offline downloads
VS
LMS
Lightweight music server with Subsonic API support
| Feature | Finamp | LMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Dart | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,169 | ★ 1,654 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Plexamp, Spotify | Spotify |
Why pick each one
Choose LMS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Finamp or LMS better?
Finamp is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider LMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Finamp and LMS free and open-source?
Yes. Finamp is licensed under MPL-2.0 and LMS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Finamp and LMS with Docker?
Finamp: check the project docs for container support. LMS: yes.