Ampache vs Finamp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Ampache
Web-based audio and video streaming application
VS
Finamp
Jellyfin music player with offline downloads
| Feature | Ampache | Finamp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Dart |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,815 | ★ 4,169 |
| First released | 2001 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Spotify | Plexamp, Spotify |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Ampache or Finamp better?
Finamp is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Ampache if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Ampache and Finamp free and open-source?
Yes. Ampache is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Finamp under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Ampache and Finamp with Docker?
Ampache: yes. Finamp: check the project docs for container support.