Filestash vs Paperless-AI
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
Paperless-AI
Automated AI tagging and analysis for Paperless-ngx
| Feature | Filestash | Paperless-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 5,883 |
| First released | 2017 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | DocuWare |
Why pick each one
Choose Paperless-AI if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.9k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or Paperless-AI better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Paperless-AI if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and Paperless-AI free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Paperless-AI under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and Paperless-AI with Docker?
Filestash: yes. Paperless-AI: yes.