Filestash vs OpenSign
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
OpenSign
Document signing software (alternative to DocuSign)
| Feature | Filestash | OpenSign |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 6,783 |
| First released | 2017 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | — |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenSign if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or OpenSign better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenSign if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and OpenSign free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenSign under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and OpenSign with Docker?
Filestash: yes. OpenSign: yes.