Filestash vs Open Semantic Search
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Filestash
Web-based file manager and document gateway
VS
Open Semantic Search
Search engine and text mining for document archives
| Feature | Filestash | Open Semantic Search |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,451 | ★ 1,198 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, SharePoint | DocuWare, M-Files |
Why pick each one
Choose Open Semantic Search if…
- Powerful analytics on archives
- Handles many file formats
Frequently asked questions
Is Filestash or Open Semantic Search better?
Filestash is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Open Semantic Search if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Filestash and Open Semantic Search free and open-source?
Yes. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Open Semantic Search under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Filestash and Open Semantic Search with Docker?
Filestash: yes. Open Semantic Search: yes.
Related comparisons
- Filestash vs Aleph
- Open Semantic Search vs Aleph
- Filestash vs Alfresco Community Edition
- Filestash vs Ambar
- Open Semantic Search vs Ambar
- Filestash vs Archivematica
- Open Semantic Search vs Archivematica
- Filestash vs BentoPDF
- Open Semantic Search vs BentoPDF
- Filestash vs Collabora Online
- Open Semantic Search vs Collabora Online