Pydio Cells Sync vs SeaweedFS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Pydio Cells Sync
Desktop synchronization client for Pydio Cells servers
VS
SeaweedFS
Fast distributed storage for blobs and files
| Feature | Pydio Cells Sync | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44 | ★ 33,952 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, OneDrive | Amazon S3 |
Why pick each one
Choose Pydio Cells Sync if…
- Tight Cells integration
- Cross-platform desktop app
Choose SeaweedFS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Pydio Cells Sync or SeaweedFS better?
Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Pydio Cells Sync is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Pydio Cells Sync and SeaweedFS free and open-source?
Yes. Pydio Cells Sync is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Pydio Cells Sync and SeaweedFS with Docker?
Pydio Cells Sync: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.