croc vs Pydio Cells Sync

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocPydio Cells Sync
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 44
First released20182019
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox, OneDrive

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Pydio Cells Sync if…

  • Tight Cells integration
  • Cross-platform desktop app
Pydio Cells Sync details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Pydio Cells Sync better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells Sync if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and Pydio Cells Sync free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Pydio Cells Sync under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Pydio Cells Sync with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Pydio Cells Sync: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons