Z-Push vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureZ-PushSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 152★ 33,952
First released20072015
ReplacesExchange ActiveSyncAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Z-Push if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Z-Push details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Z-Push or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Z-Push and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Z-Push is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Z-Push and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Z-Push: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons