croc vs Z-Push

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocZ-Push
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 152
First released20182007
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropExchange ActiveSync

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Z-Push if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Z-Push details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Z-Push better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Z-Push if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and Z-Push free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Z-Push under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Z-Push with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Z-Push: yes.

Related comparisons