File Browser vs Z-Push

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserZ-Push
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 152
First released20172007
ReplacesDropboxExchange ActiveSync

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Z-Push if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Z-Push details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Z-Push better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Z-Push if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Z-Push free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Z-Push under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Z-Push with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Z-Push: yes.

Related comparisons