Z-Push vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureZ-PushPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 152★ 43,003
First released20072026
ReplacesExchange ActiveSync

Why pick each one

Choose Z-Push if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Z-Push details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Z-Push or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Z-Push if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Z-Push and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Z-Push is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Z-Push and Puter with Docker?

Z-Push: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons