File Browser vs Unison
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | File Browser | Unison |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 15 · At risk | 88 · Excellent |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | OCaml |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,937 | ★ 5,493 |
| First released | 2017 | 1999 |
| Replaces | Dropbox | Dropbox |
What are File Browser and Unison?
File Browser
File Browser provides a clean web interface to manage files within a specified directory, supporting upload, download, sharing, and user accounts. It suits users who want simple browser-based access to a folder rather than a full sync platform. It ships as a single Go binary and a small Docker image.
- Single-binary web file manager
- User accounts and share links
- Built-in editor and previews
- Minimal resource usage
Unison
Unison is a mature bidirectional file synchronization tool that reconciles changes made independently on two replicas. It detects conflicts, preserves both versions, and works over SSH for secure remote syncing.
- True bidirectional sync
- Conflict detection
- Works over SSH
- Cross-platform replicas
File Browser vs Unison: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: File Browser's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Unison is actively maintained. File Browser is written in Go, while Unison is built with OCaml. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for File Browser versus GPL-3.0 for Unison. Unison is the more established project (first released 1999), while File Browser arrived in 2017. File Browser has the considerably larger community, at 35,937 GitHub stars versus 5,493. File Browser lists first-class Docker deployment; Unison does not.
Why pick each one
Choose File Browser if…
- Extremely lightweight
- Trivial to deploy
- Good for quick file access
Watch out for
- No sync client
- Limited collaboration features
Choose Unison if…
- Very reliable
- Fine-grained control
Watch out for
- Dated GTK interface
- Version matching between hosts
Frequently asked questions
Is File Browser or Unison better?
File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider File Browser if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are File Browser and Unison free and open-source?
Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Unison under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run File Browser and Unison with Docker?
File Browser: yes. Unison: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- File Browser vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- Unison vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- File Browser vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- Unison vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- File Browser vs copyparty
- Unison vs copyparty
- File Browser vs Dufs
- Unison vs Dufs
- File Browser vs FileBrowser Quantum
- Unison vs FileBrowser Quantum