File Browser vs ownCloud Web

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserownCloud Web
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 567
First released20172020
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose ownCloud Web if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
ownCloud Web details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or ownCloud Web better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ownCloud Web if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and ownCloud Web free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ownCloud Web under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and ownCloud Web with Docker?

File Browser: yes. ownCloud Web: yes.

Related comparisons