File Browser vs OpenCloud

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserOpenCloud
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 5,792
First released20172025
ReplacesDropboxDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose OpenCloud if…

  • Modern, fast codebase
  • Lightweight footprint
  • Permissively licensed
OpenCloud details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or OpenCloud better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenCloud if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and OpenCloud free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenCloud under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and OpenCloud with Docker?

File Browser: yes. OpenCloud: yes.

Related comparisons