FileBrowser Quantum vs Twake Drive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Twake Drive
Open-source collaborative file storage and workspace
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Twake Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Groupware |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 980 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose Twake Drive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Twake Drive better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Twake Drive if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Twake Drive free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Twake Drive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Twake Drive with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Twake Drive: yes.