FileBrowser Quantum vs SFTPGo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
SFTPGo
Full-featured SFTP, FTP and WebDAV server
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | SFTPGo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 12,371 |
| First released | 2024 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose SFTPGo if…
- Multi-protocol in one binary
- Flexible storage backends
- Strong access controls
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or SFTPGo better?
Neither is universally better. SFTPGo has the larger community, while FileBrowser Quantum is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and SFTPGo free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SFTPGo under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and SFTPGo with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. SFTPGo: yes.