FileBrowser Quantum vs Pydio Cells
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FileBrowser Quantum
Enhanced web file manager fork with extra features
VS
Pydio Cells
Document sharing and collaboration for organizations
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Pydio Cells |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,695 | ★ 2,241 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Box, Google Drive |
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.7k GitHub stars
Choose Pydio Cells if…
- Strong enterprise features
- Modern Go codebase
- Good access governance
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Pydio Cells better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Pydio Cells free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pydio Cells under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Pydio Cells with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Pydio Cells: yes.