FileBrowser Quantum vs Pydio Cells
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | FileBrowser Quantum | Pydio Cells |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 92 · Excellent | 86 · Excellent |
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,406 | ★ 2,252 |
| First released | 2024 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Dropbox | Dropbox, Box, Google Drive |
What are FileBrowser Quantum and Pydio Cells?
FileBrowser Quantum
FileBrowser Quantum is a community fork of File Browser that adds advanced search, multiple sources, and improved performance. It provides a web interface for managing files on a server.
- Advanced indexed search
- Multiple file sources
- Improved performance over original
Pydio Cells
Pydio Cells is a content collaboration platform for organizations, offering file sharing, workspaces, and access controls. It is designed for teams and enterprises needing governed document collaboration. It is deployed via Docker or native binaries.
- Workspace-based collaboration
- Granular access control
- Built-in search and metadata
- Mobile and desktop clients
FileBrowser Quantum vs Pydio Cells: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — Apache-2.0 for FileBrowser Quantum versus AGPL-3.0 for Pydio Cells. FileBrowser Quantum is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Pydio Cells. Pydio Cells is the more established project (first released 2018), while FileBrowser Quantum arrived in 2024. FileBrowser Quantum has the considerably larger community, at 8,406 GitHub stars versus 2,252.
Why pick each one
Choose FileBrowser Quantum if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8.4k GitHub stars
Choose Pydio Cells if…
- Strong enterprise features
- Modern Go codebase
- Good access governance
Watch out for
- Heavier than simple tools
- Smaller community
Frequently asked questions
Is FileBrowser Quantum or Pydio Cells better?
FileBrowser Quantum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FileBrowser Quantum and Pydio Cells free and open-source?
Yes. FileBrowser Quantum is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pydio Cells under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FileBrowser Quantum and Pydio Cells with Docker?
FileBrowser Quantum: yes. Pydio Cells: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, FileBrowser Quantum or Pydio Cells?
FileBrowser Quantum has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Pydio Cells. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- FileBrowser Quantum vs Syncthing Android Wrapper
- FileBrowser Quantum vs Ceph
- Pydio Cells vs Ceph
- FileBrowser Quantum vs closet GoToSocial NoNo upspin
- FileBrowser Quantum vs Cloudreve
- Pydio Cells vs Cloudreve
- FileBrowser Quantum vs copyparty
- Pydio Cells vs copyparty
- FileBrowser Quantum vs CryptPad
- Pydio Cells vs CryptPad